Microsoft claims controversial Georgia regulation will ‘unfairly limit the legal rights of men and women to vote’

Microsoft is not often shy about wading into the political dialogue these times, and the latest missive from president Brad Smith is no exception: in a blog write-up titled “Why we are concerned about Georgia’s new election law,” he slams the state’s new Election Integrity Act for building it more durable for its personnel (and other individuals) to vote — creating Microsoft the initial massive tech business to discuss out versus the legislation.

If it’s not crystal clear why Microsoft would go out on a limb to problem the condition on this specific problem, there are a couple of issues you ought to probably know:

  1. As Smith factors out, Microsoft is turning out to be a big employer in the point out — he suggests Atlanta is “on the route toward getting to be one particular of Microsoft’s largest hubs in the United States in the coming 10 years, following Puget Sound and Silicon Valley.” He writes that Microsoft’s staff alone will most likely have 80 p.c less drop containers for their ballots as a immediate outcome of the law, among the other constraints.
  2. Major companies in Ga are at present below scrutiny from activists, including some threatening to boycott both equally Delta Air Traces and Coke for failing to condemn the regulation. #BoycottDelta and #BoycottCocaCola were trending topics, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution noted Monday. While Delta and Coca-Cola have each now referred to as the bill “unacceptable” in a new memo and a new interview respectively, it may well be a small late. Microsoft is now positioning itself favorably in contrast to these other huge providers, largely by getting a newcomer that presently issued a tweet.
  3. Smith, the company’s former chief lawful officer, is continue to toeing the line below. Even though lots of critics of the Georgia law are fortunately calling it a kind of voter suppression, Microsoft basically clarifies how this may well be “challenging” for voters alternatively than tugging on heartstrings. Smith does not get any spicier than “From our perspective, there is no rational basis for the Ga legislature to authorize secure fall boxes but restrict their use so severely” or “Can any one imagine telling taxpayers that they should quit applying a mailbox to send in their tax return four times right before taxes are owing?”
  4. There’s no guarantee of any action from Microsoft, just a hope that “companies will arrive collectively and make very clear that a healthier enterprise demands a healthful community,” and that “we must do the job together to push the Ga legislature to modify it.”

It’s nice to see Microsoft — or any corporation — voice a desire to sustain or enhance voting rights and explain why, though.